Research

Competitive Teardown

Structured comparison of positioning, pricing pages and product claims.

About

Compares a defined set of competitors along the dimensions your team actually sells on: positioning, proof, pricing model and onboarding promise. Output is a table, not an essay.

How to use

Name three to five competitors and the dimensions you care about. The assistant researches public sources and marks every gap it could not verify.

Step by step

  1. 01

    Define the set

    Pick three to five competitors that actually show up in your deals.

  2. 02

    Fix the dimensions

    Decide upfront what you compare so the result stays usable.

  3. 03

    Review the gaps

    Everything the assistant could not verify is flagged and needs a human check.

What you get

Comparison table
Claim and proof map
Open questions list
Back to all skills

Client voices

What teams say after the week

Short feedback from hackathons with engineering, marketing, operations and leadership teams.

Our engineers built a code-review assistant in two days that the whole team still uses. No training ever did that.
Engineering leadNavVis
The whole agency was building. Marketers with zero coding background shipped content pipelines that saved real hours.
Managing directorYOYABA
Procurement workflows that used to sit on a roadmap were prototyped and demoed inside the same week.
Head of operationsOnventis
Our leadership cohort left with five working agents and a completely different sense of what AI can do for us.
Programme ownerAdobe cohort

Book a slot

Ready to turn learning into working prototypes?

Start with one team. In one week, leave with practical skills, shipped output and momentum. Just pick a free slot below.

The calendar is loaded from Cal.com and sets its own cookies. It only starts once you request it here.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Still something open? We clear it up in 20 minutes.

Book a discovery call